The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition on behalf of the petitioner as it was voluntarily withdrawn by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-103 of 2014 Date of decision: - 12.05.2014
Nusrat Khan
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Adish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Amarjit Khurana, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the State.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner intends to
withdraw the instant petition, as having becomes infructuous.
Dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for.
May 12, 2014 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Kumar Naresh 2014.05.20 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Nusrat Khan
State of Punjab
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
