A civil revision petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls, according to an oral order delivered by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 3064 of 1997 Date of decision: - 05.02.2014
The Amritsar District Cooperative Milk Production Union
...Petitioner
Versus
M/s Walia Traders Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Nemo for the parties.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
As nobody is appearing on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls, therefore, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
February 05, 2014 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Kumar Naresh 2014.02.11 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
The Amritsar District Cooperative Milk Production Union
M/s Walia Traders Pvt. Ltd.
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
