The High Court dismissed a revision petition filed against an order allowing an amendment of a plaint in a suit for declaration and injunction, characterizing the petition as a vexatious and meritless attempt.
The revision petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.2296 of 2006 Date of Decision.04.02.2014
Raghbir Kaur
......Petitioner
Versus
Gagandeep Singh and others
......Respondents
Present: Mr. N.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
dismissed.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
February 04, 2014 Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.02.13 14:51Pankaj* I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revision petition filed 15 years after the suit was instituted constitutes a vexatious attempt and is a meritless exercise.
Raghbir Kaur
Gagandeep Singh
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
