The court held the present petition to be rendered infructuous and dismissed it accordingly without issuing any substantive reasons or ruling on the preliminary questions raised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.765 of 2005 (O&M) Date of decision:01.07.2014
Ujjagar Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
Balwinder Singh and another
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:- Mr. Chetan Salathia, Advocate for Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition
has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
July 01, 2014
savita
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
Kadian Savita 2014.07.02 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Ujjagar Singh
Balwinder Singh and another
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
