The single-judge bench dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution as the appellants have been absent without representation since February 2009.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
RSA No.738 of 1986 (O&M) Date of decision: 6.8.2013
Ujagar Singh & anr.
-----appellant(s)
Vs.
State of Punjab & ors.
-----Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Mr. Vishal Garg, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J.
A perusal of the various orders on the file would show
that no one is appearing on behalf of the appellants since February, 2009. It may further be noticed that even registered A.D. notices sent to the appellants have not been received back served or otherwise.
As per office report, even notices sent to the appellants for today have been received back with the report that addresses of appellants are incomplete.
Kumar Ashwani 2013.08.12 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
RSA No.738 of 1986
2
In view thereof, this Court is not inclined to proceed further with the case and the same is dismissed for nonprosecution.
August 06, 2013 [RAKESH KUMAR GARG] ak JUDGE
Kumar Ashwani 2013.08.12 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Ujagar Singh & anr.
State of Punjab & ors.
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
