A single-paragraph order dismissing an appeal that had been lingering for over a year due to repeated requests for adjournment by the appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
F.A.O. No. 647 of 2009 (O&M)
Date of decision: January 31, 2013
Darshana Devi and others
.. Appellants
Vs.
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. and others
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Mr. H.S. Deol, Advocate for Mr. L.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.
A.N. Jindal, J
The case is lingering on for the last more than 1- ½ years and it is being adjourned time and again. Even today also, learned proxy counsel for the appellants prays for adjournment, which is declined.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
January 31, 2013 deepak
(A.N. Jindal) Judge
Darshana Devi and others
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. and others
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
