The High Court declared the appeal from the Election Tribunal order regarding the 2008 election infructuous due to the efflux of time and disposed of the matter accordingly.
The appeal was declared infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.2900 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:23.08.2013
Lakhvir Kaur
....Appellant
Versus
Charan Kaur and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:- None for the appellant.
Mr. Bhupender Banga, Advocate for Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Ms. Anupama Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Saurabh Kaushik, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 6.
Ms. Monika Chibbar Sharma, DAG, Punjab.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
By efflux of time, the present appeal has become infructuous as it pertains to the order of the Election Tribunal in respect of election held on 26.05.2008.
Ordered accordingly.
August 23, 2013
savita
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
Kadian Savita 2013.08.26 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Lakhvir Kaur
Charan Kaur and others
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
