The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held the appeal in FAO No.117 of 2010 as infructuous upon hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.117 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.7.2013
Surekha Devi
......Appellant(s)
Versus
Election Tribunal, Gurdaspur & ors.
......Respondent(s)
CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present: Mr. Ashish Grover, Advocate for Mr. H.S. Sethi, Advocate for the appellant.
Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral)
Counsel for the appellant states that the present appeal has
become infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
July 11, 2013 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE
Saini Pushpinder 2013.07.19 12:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Surekha Devi
Election Tribunal, Gurdaspur & ors.
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
