In an oral order on a writ petition regarding land acquisition compensation, the High Court acquitted the petitioners upon failure to prove land ownership for some applicants, leading to the disposal of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 13656 of 2012 (O & M) Date of Decision:- May 06, 2013
Sandeep and others
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
State of Haryana and others
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:Mr. Sumeet Sheokand, Advocate, for Mr. R.S. Tacoria, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Ms. Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, for Mr. Gagandeep Wasu, Advocate, for respondent no. 3.
Mr. Yashwinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent no. 4.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge 06.05.2013 (G.S. Sandhawalia) shivani Judge
Sandeep and others
State of Haryana and others
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
