Petitioners withdrawn the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars; the petition was dismissed.
Dismissal of the withdrawn petition with liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 7799 of 2013
DATE OF DECISION : 11.04.2013
Shanti Devi and another
.... PETITIONERS
Versus
Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Minderjeet Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral )
Learned counsel states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
April 11, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Shanti Devi
another
Haryana Urban Development Authority
others
Satish Kumar Mittal
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
