Counsel for the petitioner had no instructions. The writ petition was dismissed with liberty to seek revival.
Liberty to seek revival of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 7488 of 1993 Date of decision: 07.02.2013
Ram Dia
........ Petitioner
Versus
Director, Consolidation, Haryana and others .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajive Bhalla Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal
-.-
Present: Mr. R S Chahar, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. D Khanna, Additional A G, Haryana for respondents No. 1 to 3
-.-
Rajive Bhalla, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner pleads no instruction.
Dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival.
(Rajive Bhalla) Judge
(Rekha Mittal) Judge
07.02.2013 mohan
Ram Dia
Director, Consolidation, Haryana
Rajive Bhalla
Rekha Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
