Petitioner was permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to pursue the substantive remedy already pending before the competent authority.
Liberty to pursue the remedy already pending before the competent authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 6467 of 2013
DATE OF DECISION : 08.04.2013
Inderjeet Singh
.... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral )
Learned counsel states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue the remedy already pending before the competent authority.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
April 08, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Inderjeet Singh
State of Haryana
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
AMOL RATTAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
