Grave concerns affecting the petitioner's livelihood. Petitioner moved for revival of his case. Court deemed the petition infructuous due to lapse of time and disposed of it, keeping rights intact.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.6049 of 1992 (O & M)
Date of Decision: February 15, 2013
Gurpal Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab, Chandigarh and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Singh Sethi, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is related to grant of two regular stage carriage permits for plying eight return trips daily for the mini bus operation on Boha-Junir route.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
February 15, 2013 sukhpreet
Gurpal Singh
The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab, Chandigarh and others
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
