A single-paragraph oral order disposing of a writ petition. The bench followed a Supreme Court precedent (‘State of Haryana Vs. Hem Lata Gupta’) and directed the matter to be decided within eight weeks.
Order disposed with direction to take decision within 08 weeks and communicate to parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.4911 of 1998
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.4911 of 1998 Date of decision: 21.03.2013
Mahinder Singh, Lecturer in History, Government Senior Secondary School, Gurgaon and others.
.....Petitioners
VERSUS
State of Haryana and another
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present: Mr. Ravi Verma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Kartar Singh, DAG, Haryana, for respondents.
K. KANNAN, J.(ORAL)
The issue that stood for consideration has been covered through a judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Haryana Vs. Hem Lata Gupta. The petitioner would be entitled to obtain consideration of the case in the light of the judgment rendered above.
The writ petition is disposed of with above directions but decision will be taken within a period of 08 weeks and communicated to the parties.
21.03.2013 [ K. KANNAN ] Diwaker Gulati JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to consideration of the case in light of the Supreme Court judgment in State of Haryana Vs. Hem Lata Gupta.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana Vs. Hem Lata GuptaFollowed¶15
State of Haryana Vs. Hem Lata Gupta
Mahinder Singh
State of Haryana
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
