The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition as withdrawn. While dismissing the proceeding, the court directed the trial court to expedite the ongoing trial and conclude it within six months of receiving the order copy.
Expeditious direction to the trial court to conclude the trial within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-22483 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision:. 20.03.2013
Rajinder Singh
... Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab & Anr.
... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
Present:Mr. A.S. Barnala, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Shivali, AAG Punjab.
None for respondent no.2. ---
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK,J(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the
instant petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Keeping in view the facts of the case as alleged in the petition, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
March 20,2013 ( VIJENDER SINGH MALIK ) Jiten JUDGE
Rajinder Singh
State of Punjab
Vijender Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
