Parkash Wati v. U.O.I and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.27776 of 2013 Date of Decision: December 18, 2013
Parkash Wati ……Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ……Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA.
- Present : Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Hitesh Kaplish, Central Government Standing Counsel for Union of India-respondent No.1. Mr.Rishi Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2. Mr.P.S.Bajwa, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondent Nos.3&4.
- Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
- To be referred to the Reporters or not?
- Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
For orders, see order of even date passed in CWP No.27767 of 2013 (Hardeep Singh versus Union of India and
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parkash Wati
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
Surya Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/27776/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court