Petitioners sought withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to represent to HUDA regarding alternative plots. The Court allowed the withdrawal with the stated liberty.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to make a detailed representation to HUDA.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 17861 of 2002
Date of Decision:- 19.03.2013.
Mahipal Singh and others
.....Petitioners
Versus
Haryana Urban Development Authority and another
.....Respondents
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present:Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. J.P. Bhatt, Advocate for the respondents.
********
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to make detailed representation to the HUDA after mentioning the correct particulars of the land which was acquired and oustee policy under which the petitioners are entitled for allotment of alternative plots.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
19.03.2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) reema JUDGE
Mahipal Singh and others
Haryana Urban Development Authority
Satish Kumar Mittal
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
