Kharak Singh v. Deputy Commissioner an Dors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.16396 of 2009 Date of decision: 02.07.2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Kharak Singh
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
D.C. Muktsar & ors.
......Respondent(s)
CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present: Mr. Harminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vishal Garg, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate for respondent No.4.
Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the parties have jointly stated that the present
petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
Ordered accordingly.
July 02, 2013 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE
Saini Pushpinder 2013.07.19 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Kharak Singh
D.C. Muktsar & ors.
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court