The petitioner expired before the hearing; the writ petition for appointment as Junior Librarian was held infructuous and disposed of without further merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 14535 of 1994 Date of Decision:- April 05, 2013
Mehar Singh
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
State of Haryana and others
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:Ms. Manruchi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. S.S. Patter, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ramesh Goyal, Advocate, for respondent no. 3.
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states the petitioner has expired.
The relief claimed in this petition is for appointment as Junior Librarian.
Accordingly, the petition has been rendered infructuous and the
same is disposed of as such.
05.04.2013 (G.S. Sandhawalia) shivani Judge
Mehar Singh
State of Haryana
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
