The High Court allowed an application for preponement of the writ petition. The petitioners withdrew the writ petition with liberty to approach the court after the election process concludes.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the court after the election.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.13029 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:-24.06.2013
Swaran Singh and another
.....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL
Present:Mr. P.K. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.(Oral)
C.M. No.9019 of 2013
The applicant has filed C.M. No.9019 of 2013 for preponment of the case.
For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the main case is taken up for hearing today. CWP No. 13029 of 2013
In view of the fact that the election process has already started and nomination papers have also been filed, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty to avail the remedy as per law after the election.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
24.06.2013 ( REKHA MITTAL) reema JUDGE
Swaran Singh and another
State of Punjab and others
Satish Kumar Mittal
Rekha Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
