The writ petition was dismissed as it had been withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel. No substantive legal proposition was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.11022 of 2013 Date of Decision: May 21, 2013
Krishan Chand
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Present: Mr.Sunny Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.(ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ
petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for.
May 21, 2013 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) ramesh JUDGE
Krishan Chand
State of Punjab
Augustine George Masih
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
