The High Court held that the current writ petition, alleging grievances regarding promotion rules, has become infructuous due to the amendment of rules on 05.06.1998 which introduced a redressal mechanism. The court disposed of the petition on these grounds.
The writ petition was disposed of as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.10100 of 1990 (O&M) Date of decision:15.07.2013
Excise and Taxation Ministerial Staff Association, Haryana (Regd.) 31-A, Prem Colony, Amar Nagar, Faridabad-121 003 through its General Secretary Shri Gopi Chand Sedha, and others.
...Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana, through Secretary Excise and Taxation Department, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh, and others.
....Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present: Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Kunal Garg, AAG, Haryana.
K.Kannan, J. (Oral)
Civil Writ Petition No.10100 of 1990 (O&M) - 2 -
the writ petition could be disposed of as having become infructuous and such of those persons, who are members of the association and who are affected, would have a right of challenge in the manner provided under the amended rules.
(K.KANNAN) JUDGE
15.07.2013 sanjeev
Excise and Taxation Ministerial Staff Association, Haryana (Regd.)
State of Haryana
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
