This revision petition regarding alleged absence of counsel during cross-examination is disposed of, with instructions to file an application for review to condone delay. No substantive legal principle is established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
CR No. 145 of 2013 Date of decision January 11, 2013
Brij Bhusan Bagga
....... Petitioner
Vs.
Kulbhusan Bagga and others
........ Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present:Mr. Amandeep Singh Gill , Advocate for the petitioner.
K. Kannan, J (oral).
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
January 11, 2013 archana
Brij Bhusan Bagga
Kulbhusan Bagga
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
