Amritpal Kaur v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition seeking extension of parole period was dismissed as the explanation provided was not satisfactory and no case for interference was made out.
The petition seeking extension of parole period was dismissed as the explanation provided was not satisfactory and no case for interference was made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.1293 of 2013 Date of decision: 02.07.2013
Amritpal Kaur
…..Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
……Respondents
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice G.S.Sandhawalia
Present: Mr.Kushaldeep S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner
Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral)
This petition has been filed for extension of parole period granted to the petitioner which is going to expire today. The explanation given for extension is not satisfactory.
No case is made out for interference.
Dismissed.
(Jasbir Singh) Judge
02.07.2013 (G.S.Sandhawalia) gk Judge
Amritpal Kaur
State of Punjab
Jasbir Singh
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court