The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the criminal miscellaneous application for quashing an FIR. However, upon counsel stating the petition was withdrawn with a plea to file pleas in the trial court, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-9207 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: March 22, 2013
Sukesh Kumar
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Sahil Abhi, Advocate for the petitioner.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.17540 of 2013
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-9207 of 2013
The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No.122, dated 23.8.2012, under Sections 279, 337, 338, 427, 304-A IPC, registered at Police Station Division No.7, District Ludhiana.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition on the plea that he would take all the pleas before learned trial Court.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
22.3.2013
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the clarification that the petitioner would take the matter before the trial court warrants allowance of the quashing petition application.
Whether the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR should be permitted to proceed to adjudication or dismissed as withdrawn.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sukesh Kumar
State of Punjab
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
