Dismissed
Sunil Kumar v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/5567/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-5567 of 2013 Date of decision: July 02, 2013
Sunil Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr.Subhash Godara, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.
INDERJIT SINGH, J. (Oral)
On instructions from ASI Jasraj Singh, learnerd Addl. Advocate General, Haryana stated that the petitioner has already been acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge, Ambala vide judgment dated 31.05.2013 and therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view the above, the present petition stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
July 02, 2013 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE
Sunil Kumar
State of Haryana
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court