Sirajuddin Ahmad v. Ut of Chandigarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP…
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 12653 of 2013 Date of Decision:- May 31, 2013
Sirajuddin Ahmad
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
Union Territory, Chandigarh and others
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to take appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge 31.05.2013 (G.S. Sandhawalia) shivani Judge
Sirajuddin Ahmad
Union Territory, Chandigarh
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court