Petitioner withdrew a criminal miscellaneous petition after being declared innocent by the trial court. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-3798 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision:. 15.03.2013
Dhanpati
... Petitioner
vs.
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
Present:Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sidharth Sarup, DAG Haryana.
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK,J(ORAL)
Learned State counsel, on instructions of ASI Babu Lal submits that the petitioner and eleven others have been found innocent in the matter and have been taken out of the purview of the case.
In view of this statement, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
March 15,2013 ( VIJENDER SINGH MALIK ) Jiten JUDGE
Dhanpati
State of Haryana
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
