Anju Devi v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 11015 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 14.03.2013.
Anju Devi
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present:Mr. B.S. Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.
None for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4.
********
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for respondents No. 2 to 4 states that the Administrator HUDA Rohtak will take a final decision on the letter written by the Estate Officer, HUDA, Bahadurgarh to the Administrator, HUDA Rohtak, on 4.10.2011, copy of which has been annexed as Annexures P-7, within a period of three months.
In view of the aforesaid statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition.
Dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to challenge the order if it goes against her.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 14.03.2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) reema JUDGE
Anju Devi
State of Haryana
Satish Kumar Mittal
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court