The single-judge court briefly heard a petition seeking quashing of an FIR still under investigation and dismissed it without indulging in further legal indulgence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-31861 of 2013 Date of Decision : 23.09.2013
Satpal and another
........Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH
Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioners.
R.P. NAGRATH, J. (Oral)
The instant petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 34 dated 06.07.2013, registered under Sections 452, 354, 506, 509 and 34 IPC at Police Station Taragarh, District Pathankot.
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, no indulgence is required as the FIR was registered on 06.07.2013 and is still under investigation.
Dismissed.
(R.P. NAGRATH ) JUDGE
September 23, 2013 jk
Jitender Kumar 2013.09.23 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Satpal
State of Punjab
R.P. NAGRATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
