Lalit Kumar v. Ut of Chandigarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition for bail under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner seeking remedy before the trial court.
Petition for bail under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner seeking remedy before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 30495 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: May 13, 2013.
Lalit Kumar
...... PETITIONER(s)
Versus
U.T. Chandigarh
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr. Aman Bahri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. D.D.Sharma, APP, U.T.
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition has been filed for regular bail under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR no.4 dated 22.10.2011, under Sections 420/467/468/471/473 IPC, registered at police station Vigilance, Chandigarh.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition on the plea that he would seek appropriate remedy before learned trial court.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
May 13, 2013. ‘om’
( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) JUDGE
Lalit Kumar
U.T. Chandigarh
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court