Petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous petition. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn but directed the trial court and prosecution to expedite proceedings.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; trial court directed to expedite trial; prosecution directed to produce witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-23803 of 2013 Date of Decision : 25.10.2013
Jaspal Singh
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH
Present: Mr. Gurcharan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Mikhail Kad, AAG, Punjab.
R.P. Nagrath, J. (Oral)
After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
The trial Court is, however, directed to expedite the trial.
The prosecution through State counsel is also issued
similar direction for producing witnesses before the trial Court.
October 25, 2013 ( R.P. NAGRATH ) jk JUDGE
Jitender Kumar 2013.10.26 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Jaspal Singh
State of Punjab
R.P. Nagrath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
