This was an order in a pre-arrest bail petition where the court dismissed the prayer due to the petitioner's failure to appear before the investigating officer despite prior directions issued by this court.
Prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-19991 of 2013 Date of Decision : 28.10.2013
Gurpreet Ram
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH
Present: Mr. N.K. Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Mikhail Kad, AAG, Punjab.
R.P. Nagrath, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel on instruction from ASI Narata Ram submits that despite direction issued by this Court on 11.07.2013 and thereafter on 09.09.2013, the petitioner has not appeared before the investigating officer.
Therefore, prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail is dismissed.
October 28, 2013 ( R.P. NAGRATH ) jk JUDGE
Jitender Kumar 2013.10.29 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's failure to appear before the investigating officer despite directions warrants dismissal of pre-arrest bail prayer.
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail should be allowed or dismissed.
Gurpreet Ram
State of Punjab
R.P. NAGRATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
