The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear after two calls. The previously granted interim bail was subsequently withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-19933-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 13, 2013
Sandal Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of U.T. Chandigarh and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate, for respondent No. 1-U.T. Chandigarh.
None for respondent No. 2.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
The case has been called twice since morning and it is 2:15 p.m., but no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. In spite of service, no one has put in appearance for respondent No. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
The order dated 22.7.2013, whereby interim bail was
granted to the petitioner, is withdrawn.
December 13, 2013 Pkapoor
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Kapoor Prashant 2013.12.13 16:39 I attest to the accuracy of this order
Sandal Singh
State of U.T. Chandigarh
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
