The High Court declared the petitioner's criminal miscellaneous petition infructuous after additional accused persons were summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C., making effective trial possible against them regarding rape allegations.
Petition declared infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-18829 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.05.2013
Gurpreet Kaur
..Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab & another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
Present: Mr.Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. G.S. Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.
M.M.S. BEDI, J.(ORAL)
Grievance of the petitioner that no action is being taken against respondents No. 9, 10 and 11 in the case of rape, seems to have ceased with an order passed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning respondents No. 9, 10 and 11 as additional accused. The said persons can now be effectively tried to determine their culpability for the offence alleged against them by the petitioner. This petition has thus become infructuous.
Disposed of having rendered infructuous.
(M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE
29.05.2013 Poonam (II)
Gurpreet Kaur
State of Punjab
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
