Petitioners challenged the non-service of summons while the FIR was recent. The court dismissed the petition as premature, allowing them to file anew if a challan is later served.
Petition disposed of as premature; liberty granted to file fresh petition if challan is presented.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM M- 17184 2013
[1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
CRM M-17184 2013 (O&M)
Date of Decision: May 27, 2013
Angrej Singh and another
…..Petitioners
Vs.
State of Punjab and others
…..Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.
-.-
Present:Mr.K.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners.
-.-
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the challan has not
been presented.
The FIR was registered only in March 2013.
The petition is disposed of as premature with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh petition, in case the prosecution agency opts to present challan.
May 27, 2013 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE
CRM M- 17184 2013 [2]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the service of summons challan was required before proceeding with the petition.
Angrej Singh and another
State of Punjab and others
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
