The petitioner moved a petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court intending to withdraw it as it became infructuous. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-16860 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 05.09.2013
Baldev Singh @ Tita
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Parminder Singh Sekhon, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S. Aulakh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for the State.
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR , J.(oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner intends to
withdraw the instant petition, as having become infructuous.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
September 05, 2013 ( M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR) naresh.k JUDGE
Kumar Naresh 2013.09.12 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Baldev Singh @ Tita
State of Punjab
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
