The High Court at Chandigarh dismissed a petition upon withdrawal by counsel, granting liberty to file a fresh petition after defects were removed.
Liberty to file a fresh petition after removing defects.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-11104 of 2013 Date of decision : 04.09.2013
Narinder Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. B.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. R.P.S. Sidhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 to 7.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the
present petition to enable the petitioners to file fresh petition, after removing the defects.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed
for.
September 04, 2013 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Kumar Naresh 2013.09.06 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Narinder Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
