Anticipatory bail petition dismissed as withdrawn by petitioner to file fresh petition for regular bail after court expressed unwillingness to grant bail due to allegations of embezzlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-16649 of 2013 Date of Decision:- 22.05.2013
Gaurav
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR.
Present: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioner.
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR , J.(oral)
After arguing the matter for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, containing specific allegations of embezzlement of huge amount, then learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioner to file fresh petition for regular bail.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed
for.
May 22, 2013 ( M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR) naresh.k JUDGE
Gaurav
State of Haryana
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
