“I have considered the contentions of learned counsel for complainant. A perusal of the case file shows that Bhanwar Lal had earlier also executed an agreement to sell the said plot in favour of one Harish Kumar and it was agreed that the remaining payment shall be made by Harish Kumar or subsequent purchaser. A sum of Rs.75000/- was received by Bhanwar Lal and his wife by executing receipt. On the basis of said agreement, Harish Kumar had sold the4 plot to Chander Mohan Sharma for Rs.3,60,000/-. Chander Mohan sold the plot to Ajit Arora for a sum of Rs.3,80,000/- and Ajit Arora sold the plot to Arihant Jain for a sum of Rs.7,51,000/-. It has also revealed from the documents available on the case file that the first two instalments were paid by Ajit Arora from his account total amounting to Rs.3,36,000/- and third instalment was deposited by Sachin Jain, brother of Arihant Jain from his account for Rs.61,000/-. Although accused Arihant Jain had taken plea that a sum o9f Rs.2,50,000/- was paid by him at the residence of complainant but there is no receipt of the same on the case file. The version of accused is that the complainant had asked him to get the original documents photocopied and while getting the documents photocopied, he removed the receipt of Rs.2,50,000/-. However, this version could not be proved at this stage. However, the possession was delivered to Arihant Jain by DDA and complainant had signed the said possession letter. It appears that as the value of the plot has risen to manifolds, the complainant had become dishonest and filed the present FIR. On the case file, there are several documents, which show that complainant had earlier also
