The High Court held that since the private factions had sorted out disputes and the complaint was withdrawn, the present petition had become infructuous. The matter was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-15556-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 16, 2013
Manoj Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
Sheetal and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Dalip Kumar Tuteja, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Deepak Girhotra, AAG, Haryana, for respondent No. 2.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that better sense has prevailed and both the private factions have sorted out their disputes and effected a compromise. As a sequel thereto the complaint has been withdrawn and, as such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of accordingly.
December 16, 2013 Pkapoor
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Kapoor Prashant 2013.12.17 18:19 I attest to the accuracy of this order
Manoj Kumar
Sheetal
another
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
