The court allowed the petitioner's petition to make an interim anticipatory bail order absolute. Permission was granted after the petitioner joined the investigation and the complainant indicated the matter had been compromised.
The interim order dated 17.1.2013 is made absolute subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr.Misc. M 1540 of 2013 Date of decision:- 11.3.2013
Raghbir Kaur
Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab
Respondent
Present: Mr. As Sivia, Advocate. Mr.Ankur Jain,AAG, Punjab Mr. KBS Mann, Advocate.
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
In view of petitioner having joined the investigation and counsel for the complainant having brought to the notice of the court that the matter has been compromised, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 17.1.2013 is hereby made absolute subject to all the conditions u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C.
March 11 ,2013 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim anticipatory bail order should be made absolute given that the petitioner joined the investigation and the matter was compromised.
Whether the conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. bind the court in making the interim order absolute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raghbir Kaur
State of Punjab
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
