The petition under Article 226 regarding cheque dishonour was disposed of as withdrawn due to prematurity, noting the challan had not been presented.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn being premature.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-1235 of 2013 (O&M). Date of decision: March 11, 2013.
Harcharan Singh and others
..... Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT: Mr.Maharaj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
M.M.S. BEDI, J (ORAL).
Counsel for the petitioners has informed that the challan has not been presented. It appears that the petition is premature.
Disposed of as withdrawn being pre-mature at this stage with liberty to the petitioners to approach this Court again in case the challan is presented and there is no material available on the record against the petitioners.
March 11, 2013. rka
(M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE
Harcharan Singh
State of Punjab
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
