Ajay Tayal v. State of Punjab & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-14746 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: May 14, 2013
Ajay Tayal
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab and another
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.H.S.Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.24555 of 2013
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.No.M-14746 of 2013
The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No.37, dated 14.7.2011, under Sections 420, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Daresi, District Ludhiana, Annexure P1, and the police report filed under Section 173 Cr.P.C., Annexure P2.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition on the plea that he would seek appropriate remedy by way of revision against the order framing charge against the petitioner by learned trial Court.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
14.5.2013
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Tayal
State of Punjab
RAM CHAND GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court