Allowed

Jatinder Kaur and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC9 May 2013CRM-M/14021/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 482 CrPC for protection of life and liberty. Court disposed of petition with direction to Senior Superintendent of Police, Nawashaher to take action on petitioners application dated 24.4.2013 without adjudicating merits or validity of marriage.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.3, Senior Superintendent of Police, Nawashaher, to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 24.4.2013.

Jatinder Kaur and Anr. Vs Stat… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2013)

¶1

-1-

¶2

Crl.M.No.M-14021 of 2013(O&M)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

Crl.M.No.M-14021 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: May 9, 2013

¶5

Jatinder Kaur and another

¶6

.....Petitioners

¶7

¶8

The State of Punjab and others

¶9

......Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA

¶11

Present: Petitioners in person with Mr.C.L.Pawar, Advocate.

¶12

.....

¶13

RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶14

Crl.M.No.23765 of 2013

¶15

Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-14021 of 2013

¶16

The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.5 to 8.

¶17

Heard.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.3, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Nawashaher, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 24.4.2013, Annexure P4, already made to him by the petitioners.

¶19

As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. Date of birth of petitioner no.1-Jatinder Kaur, as per copy of Matriculation Examination Certificate, Annexure P1, is 19.9.1994 and date of birth of petitioner No.2-Lakhvir Singh, as per copy of Middle Standard Examination Certificate, Annexure P2, is 6.11.1986. They got married on 24.4.2013. Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P3.

¶20

In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the

¶21

-2-

¶22

Crl.M.No.M-14021 of 2013(O&M)

¶23

petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.3, i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, Nawashaher to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 24.4.2013, Annexure P4, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners.

¶24

However, it is made clear that this order will be having no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners and also on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as per law.

¶25

9.5.2013

¶26

meenu

¶27

(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge

Jatinder Kaur and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jatinder Kaur and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurtej Singh Vs State of Punjab

Satinder Singh Vs State of Punjab

Sarabjeet Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Mukhtar Masih Vs State of Punjab and Others

Karamjit Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Sita Ram and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.