Short order referring petitioner to a separate judgment (Kamal Rani) decided on the same date. No substantive reasoning or independent decision provided in this text. (43 words)
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-13192 of 2013
Date of Decision:10.05.2013
Gulshan Kumar .....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab .....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR.
Present: Mr.Hardeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.K.S.Aulakh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent-State.
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR , J.(oral)
For detailed order see CRM No.M-13170 of 2013, titled as
Kamal Rani and others Versus State of Punjab , decided vide a
separate order of the even date.
May 10, 2013 ( M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR) seema JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kamal Rani and others Versus State of PunjabReferred¶12
Kamal Rani and others Versus State of Punjab
GULSHAN KUMAR
STATE OF PUNJAB
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
