The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent despite being called thrice. No legal principle was propounded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-1262 of 2013 Date of Decision:15.01.2013
Rattan Chan
... Petitioner
vs.
Kishan Kumar and ors. ... Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
Present:None for the petitioner. --
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK,J(ORAL)
None was appearing on behalf of the petitioner despite having been passed over thrice in the pre-lunch session. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
January 15, 2013 ( VIJENDER SINGH MALIK ) dinesh JUDGE
Rattan Chan
Kishan Kumar and ors.
Vijender Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
