In a written petition, the State counsel stated there was no threat to life, liberty, or safety. The Court granted relief directioning respondents not to take petitioners in custody regarding abduction or kidnapping allegations.
Direction that petitioners will not be taken in custody by any respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-12324 of 2013 (O&M). Date of decision: May 3, 2013.
Ladi Singh and another
..... Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab and others.
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT: Mr.Sandeep Arora, for the petitioners.
Mr.G.S.Sidhu, AAG., Punjab.
M.M.S. BEDI, J (ORAL).
State counsel on the instructions of ASI Labh Singh
informs that there is no threat to life and liberty of the petitioners.
Petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioners will not be taken in custody by any of the respondents on the allegations that petitioner No.1 has kidnapped or abducted petitioner No.2.
(M.M.S. BEDI) May 3, 2013. JUDGE rka
1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioners should be taken in custody by the State.
Whether allegations of kidnapping or abduction against petitioner No.1 justify custody.
Ladi Singh
another
State of Punjab
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
