Petitioner sought anticipation bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to file a fresh one after annexing the medicolegal report. Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one after annexing medicolegal report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-11901 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision: April 11, 2013.
Ravi Yadav
... Petitioner(s)
v.
State of Haryana
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: Shri Kartar Singh Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Paramjeet Singh, J. (Oral):
The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case arising out of FIR No. 87 dated 31.1.2013, registered at Police Station City Rohtak, District Rohtak, under Sections 323/324/34 IPC (Section 307 IPC added later on).
Learned Counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh one after annexing the medicolegal report.
As prayed, dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
April 11, 2013. kadyan
[ Paramjeet Singh ] Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravi Yadav
State of Haryana
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
