High Court of Punjab and Haryana dealt with a Cr.P.C. petition seeking FIR registration. It observed the petitioner has an alternative remedy and ordered disposal with liberty to approach the Illaqa Magistrate.
Petition disposed of with liberty to approach the learned Illaqa Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-11111 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: April 5, 2013
Inderjit Singh
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Ajit Singh Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for registration of FIR against respondents no.3 to 6 under Sections 420, 120-B IPC.
However, petitioner is having alternative remedy to approach learned Illaqa Magistrate for appropriate relief in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P ., 2007(5) Law Herald (Supreme Court) 3910.
Disposed of with liberty to approach learned Illaqa Magistrate.
5.4.2013
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has an alternative remedy under the Criminal Procedure Code to seek relief from the learned Illaqa Magistrate instead of seeking registration of an FIR.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P., 2007(5) Law Herald (Supreme Court) 3910Referred¶13
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Inderjit Singh
State of Punjab
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
